jazzbiker's blog

billy

2006-08-13T09:09:00.000-07:00

billy, originally uploaded by jazzbiker.

Poor Billy the Kit(ten)... he was trying so hard to have his mid-morning nap.

Gotta tell you son, if you're gonna be that cute, you're gonna have your picture taken...

power boat

2006-07-30T13:42:00.000-07:00

power boat, originally uploaded by jazzbiker.

My sweetie took Friday off and we went to a little beach we found... a rest stop really, off the Belt Parkway at Canarsie.

I haven't seen one of these little power boats since I was a kid. This guy spent most of the time we were there working on it. All told it was in the water about 10 minutes.

You can also see how close our little beach is to the highway from this shot. :)

The boys

2006-07-29T19:43:00.000-07:00

In repose

--
Sent from my Treo

I signed up to send posts to my blog from my mobile phone. It took WEEKS for the post to be acknowledged and the process to complete. Not what I'd call efficient.

By the time I got an emailed response from go.blogger.com, I'd forgotten I'd applied and almost trashed the response as spam.

Then, logging in to 'claim' my new blog took several tries before it accepted my account, and then there was the extra step of merging the new 'mobile' blog with my regular one.

All in all, not a satisfying experience.

Jots and Tittles

2006-07-25T15:49:00.000-07:00

Jots and Tittles is my sweetie's blog. She's been playing with her new camera and photoshop and posting stuff to her blog. I'm SO proud of her!

the mess in the middle east, (continued, alas)

2006-07-24T06:03:00.000-07:00

I've got to say up front that I'm Jewish (also feminist, pagan, and a bunch of other things, but when the tanks start rolling down Flatbush Ave, I'm gonna be on their list, regardless of how I choose to worship, or even if I do).

That being said, I think the mess in the middle east casts enough blame on all their houses, not just the Palestinians.

And it reminds me of nothing so much as a battered child, who grows up to be a batterer, whose child then grows up to be a batterer, etc.

You can trace back centuries (millenia?) to find the original "fault" but doing so at this remove is, I believe, truly counterproductive.

The only way out of this is to adopt Michael Lerner's amazing methods, throw in a bit of Desmond Tutu's "Reconciliation" and sit on them ALL until they talk to each other.

I don't think either side is going to sit down voluntarily for talks. I think the UN has to make them do it.

YMMV (and probably does)

Billy the Kit(ten)

2006-07-21T17:27:00.000-07:00

Billy the Kit(ten), originally uploaded by jazzbiker.

Taken with my sweetie's new camera, which I bought her so that she could put pictures of her crafts in her blog...

The camera arrived just after she left for Maryland, so I get the whole weekend to play with it... er... learn how it works :)

Cameras

2006-07-21T10:45:00.000-07:00

Now that my sweetie's got her own blog, she needs to be able to post pix of her knitting and cross-stitching and beading without having to bug me over & over until I get around to taking pictures for her.

I was musing over the cameras I saw available online and feeling frustrated that Nikon didn't have what I wanted when I realized that just because *I* have a Nikon camera doesn't mean that every camera in the house has to be a Nikon. And, because I got *really* smart, I got a Canon camera that takes the same memory card as my Nikon... so we just saved a bunch of money and the memory card I never use is now being put to good use.

And, having ordered it from Adorama Camera yesterday, which is here in NYC, the thing arrived today. So my NEXT project is to learn how to use it so that I can show my Sweetie. It's a little larger than a deck of playing cards, and has a bunch of automatic settings, so it should be fun and easy to use.

Now all I have to do is keep myself from 'borrowing' it .

TGIF?

2006-07-21T06:40:00.000-07:00

After an extremely busy (and much too hot) week last week, this week proved a bit lighter on work-I-get-paid-for, giving me a bit of a breather (and a sadly lighter wallet). And today, there's just some deskwork I've got to do, making it almost a day off :)

Hey, this consulting thing is almost like being retired!
:}

The cats, after snarling at each other this morning, are now curled up together in my recliner (leaving me only the computer chair). There are times when I'd dearly love to know what goes on in their tiny brains... and other times when I'm just as glad I don't. (Anyone remember that science fiction story where the young girl suddenly discovers what her pet bird really thinks of her? Shudder.)

learning blogging :)

2006-07-19T20:34:00.000-07:00

My sweetie just asked me how to put a link in her blog... so of course I had to come to *my* blog to find out how to do it...

Her blog? :)

BrooklynCrafter

It's way better than mine... She actually ADDS stuff to hers.

Me, I mostly post on flickr

the mess in the middle east :(

2006-07-17T04:37:00.000-07:00

This email from Michael Lerner says it far better than I could.

End the Suffering in the Middle East
By Rabbi Michael Lerner

The people of the Middle East are suffering again as militarists on all sides, and cheerleading journalists, send forth missiles, bombs and endless words of self-justification for yet another pointless round of violence between Israel and her neighbors. For those of us who care deeply about human suffering, this most recent episode in irrationality evokes tears of sadness, incredulity at the lack of empathy on all sides, anger at how little anyone seems to have learned from the past, and moments of despair as we once again see the religious and democratic ideals subordinated to the cynical realism of militarism.

Meanwhile, the partisans on each side, content to ignore the humanity of the Other, rush to assure their constituencies that the enemy is always to blame. Each such effort is pointless. We have a struggle that has been going on for over a hundred years. Who tosses the latest match into the tinder box matters little. What matters is how to repair the situation. The blame game only succeeds in diverting attention from that central issue.

Within the context of blame, theres enough to go around. It all depends on where you start the story. Counting on lack of historical memory, the partisans on all sides choose the place that best fits them into a narrative in which they are the righteous victims and the others are the evil aggressors.

Palestinians like to start the story in 1948 with the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes during the war on Israel proclaimed by neighboring Arab states, and the refusal of the Israeli government to allow these people to return to once the hostilities ceased.

Israelis prefer to start the story when Jews were desperately seeking to escape from the genocide they faced in Europe, and a cynical Arab leadership convinced the British military to side with local Palestinians who sought to prevent those Jewish refugees from joining their fellow Jews living in Palestine at the time. I tell the story, and how to understand both sides, in my book Healing Israel/Palestine.

Or one can start more recently, with this summers escalation of violence. But where exactly did that start?

Please go to the website of Israeli Human Rights Organization Btselem www.btselem.org to see that each side can point to outrageous acts on the part of the other.

Since the death of Yasir Arafat and the assumption of power by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Palestines major political factions Fatah and Hamas observed a hudna, or ceasfire. Yet Israel, pointing to the fact that Abbas police force (decimated by Israeli bombings during the 2nd Intifada of 2001-2003) was unable to fully restrain the violence of Hamas, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade and Islamic Jihadand used that weakness as its reason to claim that there was nobody to talk to when the peace forces in Israel pleaded with former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and later with current PM Ehud Olmert that the Palestinian request for negotiations should be accepted. Instead, Israel announced a unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and the northern West Bank (implemented in 2005) and from forthcoming sections of the West Bank (to have begun with the removal of illegal outposts this summer) that would de facto create new borders which would incorporate into Israel large parts of the West Bank that Israel had agreed to leave during the 1990s. Tikkun magazine and Israeli peace forces warned that the unilateral withdrawal, opposed by the Palestinian Authority, would add credibility to Hamas claim that all the Palestinian Authoritys efforts at non-violence had produced nothing more than Israel refusing to talk, whereas acts of violence by Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza had led to the IDF withdrawing to protect its soldiers.

It wouldnt be hard to see why Sharon went ahead with the unilateral withdrawal. If his intention was, as stated, to hold on to as much of the West Bank as possible, it would be far easier to convince the world that there is nobody to talk to if Hamas would win the coming election, since Hamas was universally recognized to be a terrorist group. When the Palestinian people complied by falling for this trick and establishing agovernment run by people who refused to acknowledge the right of Israel to exist, it was easy for Olmert to affirm the Sharon unilateralism and announce plans to withdraw from the West Bank that would be the political cover for Israel annexing significant parts of the Occupied Territory. Hamas played its expected role by lobbing Qassam rockets at Israeli population centers, thereby proving for the Israeli right that any withdrawal would only intensify Israeli vulnerability and give Israeli hard-liners reason to oppose Olmerts partial withdrawal as appeasement that had already failed to bring peace in Gaza.

Of course, from the standpoint of Hamas, this was only part of an ongoing struggle to free thousands of Palestinians who continue to be arrested (or, from the Palestinian perspective, kidnapped) by the IDF, incarcerated without charges or trial for six months in huge prison camps, often subject to torture. Yet Hamas, faced with an economic boycott (including the withholding to Hamas of taxes Israel collected from Palestinians that Israel had previously promised it would give back to the Palestinian Authority) that was preventing it from being able to function as a government, made statements that indicated that it was exploring the idea of de facto recognition in response to the Prisoners document, which threatened to undercut everyone because it was signed by members of every major faction of Palestinians sitting in Israeli jails).

For Israeli militarists and the settlers, Hamas recognition of Israel, however partial, would have been a dramatic propaganda defeat. Within days Israelis began shelling inside Gaza (allegedly to stop Hamas firing of Qassam rockets against Israeli population centers). One such shell landed on a Gaza beach, killing a family of eight who were simply enjoying the sun and water. A few days later, a Hamas group captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, and Israel used this as its excuse to implement a plan it had developed months before to re-enter Gaza and destroy the Hamas infrastructure.

At this point a huge escalation took place. Instead of narrowly focusing on Hamas capacity to make war, the Israelis chose the path of collective punishment, a frequently ineffective counterinsurgency policy used to eliminate public support for resistance movements. In the height of the oppressive summer heat, Israel bombed the electricity grid, effectively cutting off Gazas water and the electricity needed to keep refrigeration working, thereby guaranteeing a dramatic decrease in food for the areas already destitute, million plus population. This act was yet another violation of international law that include the arrests of thousands by Israelis and the shooting of Qassams at population centers by Hamas.

In response, Hezbollah fighters who had occupied the land abandoned by Israel when Israel terminated its occupation of southern Lebanon in 2000, launched an attack on Israeli troops inside Israel in clear violation of the understandings that peace would be maintained on that border, understandings that made it politically possible for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon without fear that its northern citizens would once again be subject to rocket fire that had put many Israelis into bomb shelters off-and-on for years since Israel had invaded Lebanon in 1982.

From the standpoint of some in the Arab world, the attack on Israeli troops in northern Israel was an act of Islamic solidarity in face of the huge escalation taken by Israel against the entire population of Gaza. They argue that what really needs to be explained is not why they acted, but why the rest of the world did not act to demand that Israel end its outrageous punishment of a million people for the acts of a few (when the U.N. tried to act, the right-wing government of the U.S. vetoed a resolution supported by the Security Council majority).

Yet from the standpoint of Israel, the attacks by Hezbollah were a blatant violation of the understanding that had kept Israel out of Lebanon for the past seven years. And in fact, it was also a violation of international law and human rights, subjecting a civilian population to random bombings aimed at terrorizing the population. Hezbollah had shown itself to be the vicious terrorist force that Israel always claimed it to be. People living in Haifa or Tsfat or dozens of other locations in Israel are at this very moment living in the same kind of fear that rekindles the fears of earlier experiences in their lives (some, remember, are Holocaust survivors, others the children of survivors, and many have lived through wars that were explicitly aimed at the annihilation of Israel). Those fears are unfortunately likely to be played on by right wing politicians in the coming years.

Nor should we underestimate the malevolence of Iran and Syria in attempting to stimulate unrest and destabilization. While there are some in both of these countries who genuinely feel outrage at Israeli behavior toward Muslim co-religionists, the record of indifference to the plight of the Palestinians in their own countries and failure to provide material support for Palestine to build up its own economic infrastructure when it was needed suggests that their assistance to Hezbollah comes more from seeking political advantage and domination in the Middle East than from genuine moral solidarity with the Palestinian people. And the fear of Iran, a country whose president out and out denies that there ever was a Holocaust and who explicitly affirms the goal of destroying the State of Israel gives Israelis real reason to worry when his proxies in Hezbollah or Hamas develop the capacity to shoot rockets into Israeli population centers.

What was Israel to do?

Well, had Ariel Sharon been in power, having learned his lesson in Lebanon, he likely would have done the exact same thing he did two years ago when an Israeli businessman was captured by the enemy namely, a prisoner exchange in which hundreds of prisoners are released for a single Israeli. That exchange had been asked for by Hamas and pleaded for by the family of POW Gilad Shalit, but was been rejected by the Israeli government. Please read the analysis of this error, and other articles analyzing the current situation at the daily updates of Current Thinking at www.tikkun.org . The consensus among Israeli peaceniks is that both Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his Labor Party Defense Minister Amir Peretz feel the political need to show that they are strong and hence the invasion and attack on Lebanon is their only politically possible strategy. For the sake of their egos and their future political viability, they must proceed with the wild escalation of the struggle against the Lebanese people, most of whom had exercised their democratic rights by rejecting Hezbollah s electoral appeals, voting in a government that had only a small minority of Hezbollah within it.

What could Israel still do? It could redefine these issues as minor border irritants, exchange POWS, and unilaterally announce that it will no longer hold arrestees for more than 3 days without filing formal criminal charges against those who had acted with violence and releasing everyone else, giving speedy and public trials, and punishing any soldier or Shin Bet or Aman officer who engages in torture (or, as they call it, moderate pressure ) on detainees. It could then immediately announce its intentions to strengthen the position of Palestinian Authority President Abbas by giving to him the tax monies withheld from Hamas, and opening final status negotiations within two months. Meanwhile, Israel could begin dismantling the Separation Wall, and promise to rebuild it only on the lines of an international border agreed to by both sides. And Israel could unilaterally censor anti-Palestinian incitement within government-controlled media and instead begin to build a culture of non-violence and educate Israelis about the need for reparations to Palestinian refugees.

What could Palestinians do? President Abbas could announce that he is inviting Israel to form a joint Israeli/Palestinian border force to ensure that there are no more violent attacks on Israeli civilians, in exchange for the immediate opening of final status negotiations with Israel before any further West Bank withdrawals are created. There were joint patrols and security coordination until Sept. 2,000 and they contributed to the low level of violence on both sides until Ariel Sharon made his famous provocative trip to the Temple Mount. Abbas could further announce that the Palestinian people who elected him are committed to a non-violent (not passive) struggle for ending the Occupation, but that anyone engaged in violence against Israel or against fellow Palestinians would be tried and, if convicted, would lose their Palestinian citizenship. Abbas could tour the West Bank and Gaza preaching non-violence, implement an immediate end to anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric in the Palestinian press and in their schools, and could announce that he is determined to build a culture of non-violence inside Palestine.

What could the U.S. and other Western states do? They could immediately establish an international conference representing all the nations of the world who were willing to accept the right of Israel to exist within the 1967 boundaries and the right of Palestine to exist within Gaza and the West Bank, and let those countries impose on both sides a settlement that is fair to both sides and enforce such a settlement, guaranteeing peace and security to both sides. Each participant country in this international conference would be allowed in after it had given to a neutral international bank a deposit equal to .01% of its GDP for the purpose of creating the beginning of an inernational fund for reparations as described below.

As the Tikkun Community has outlined in the past, the terms of that settlement should include:

Permanent boundaries for both states that roughly resemble the pre-67 borders, with some border adjustments mutually agreed to along lines developed in the Geneva Accord (Israel incorporating some of the border settlements into Israel, in exchange for Israel giving equal amounts and quality of land to the Palestinian State).

Sharing of Jerusalem and its holy sites, with each side entitled to establish their national capital in Jerusalem, Israel to have control over the Jewish and Armenian quarters plus the Wall and adjacent territory, and Palestine to have control over the Temple Mount with its mosques.

All states participating in the International Conference would dedicate at least .1% of their GDP toward an international fund for reparations for Palestinians who lost property, employment or homes in the period 1947-1967, and to Jews who fled from Arab states in the same period (however, reparations will not be paid to any Arab or Jewish family with current gross assets of more than $5 million dollars).

A joint Israel/Palestine/International Community police force will be set up to enforce border security for both sides. The U.S. and Nato will enter into a mutual security pact for both parties guaranteeing that each side will be protected by the U.S. and Nato from any assault by the other or by any assault from any other country in the world.

Creation of an Atonement and Reconciliation Commission which will unveil all records of both sides, bring to light all violations of human rights on both sides, bring formal charges against those who do not confess their involvement in those violations and testify to the details, and supervise a newly created peace curriculum for all schools and universities aimed at teaching reconciliation and non-violence in action and communication. The explicit goal of this Commission will be to foster the conditions for a reconciliation of the heart and a new understanding on the part of both peoples that each side has been cruel and insensitive, and need to repent, and that both sides have a legitimate natrrative that needs to be understood and accepted as a legitimate viewpoint by the other side.

Who are Israel s friends and the friends of the Jewish people? Those who support this path toward peace and reconciliation. Who are its enemies? Those who encourage it to persist in the fantasy that it can win militarily or politically. Just as the objective enemies of America in the 1960s were those who egged it on to persist in the Vietnam war, and those who were its objective friends were those of its citizens who actively opposed that war, so similarly today the friends of the Jewish people are those who are doing everything possible to restrain it from cheerleadng for Israel s militarist adventures and refusal to treat the Palestinians as equally entitled to freedom and self-determination as the Jewish people.

Who are Palestine s friends? Those who encourage a path of non-violence and abandoning the fantasy that armed struggle combined with political isolation of Israel will lead to a good outcome for Palestinians. Who are its enemies? Those who preach ideas like one state solution or global economic boycott without offering the Jewish people a secure state in Palestine--paths that will never produce anything positive but continued resistance by Israel and world Jewry.

As for us in the Tikkun Community who are friends of both sides, our orientation is clear. Our goal is to speak truth to both the powerful in Israel and the powerless in Palestine, to tell them that their goals cannot be achieved without a radical reversal in the strategic directions they have been following. This truth will eventually be heard the only question is whether it will be heard without another generation of Arabs and Israelis losing their lives. Because we care very much about the human suffering on both sides, we pray that this truth will be heard, and our strateges for a solution will be implemented. And we will do more than pray we will also demonstrate against the governments of the U.S., Israel and Palestine till they all change their directions in the ways suggested here, we will organize and educate, and will take other non-violent stepts to get our message heard.

You can take this message and shorten it, write its message as op-eds or letters to the editor. You can ask elected officials or candidates for office in any and every poliical party to endorse it, setting up meetings with their aides if you can t meet with them, establishing relationships, and continuing to push for this position every few moments. . You can create a local demonstration around this analysis. You can create a study group using Healing Israel/Palestine (North Atlantic Books, 2003) and The Geneva Accord and other Strategies for Middle East Peace (North Atlantic Books, 2004), so that you personally feel empowered to present a progressive middle path as an alternative to the partisans of each side. You can demand of the other peace groups that they work together with Tikkun to create a yearly gathering in Washington, D.C. of all these groups that support this kind of balanced perspective rather than having each meet with elected officials separately in order to build their own separate political power base rather than give the task of changing America s policies the highest priority (which they d do by merging with other groups and thus appearing stronger than any group can be on its own). And you can write letters to the governments of Israel and Palestine sharing this perspective, using my words or your own. So don t just sit there despairing there is much that can be done, and lives that can be saved.

But lets not abandon prayer, meditation, song and celebration either. We need moments to come together, to nourish our souls, to rekindle our hopefulness, and to joyfully recall all the goodness in the human race, including the goodness of the majority of Israelis, Jews, Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims and everyone else on the planet!

*********************************************************
Rabbi Michael Lerner is author of Jewish Renewal: A Path to Healing and Transformation (Harper, 1995), Healing Israel/Palestine (North Atlantic Books, 2003), most recently The Left Hand of God: Taking Back our Country from the Religious Right (HarperSanFrancisco, 2006) and seven other books. He is the editor of Tikkun Magazine in Berkeley (510-644 1200) and rabbi of Beyt Tikkun synagogue which meets in both San Francisco and Berkeley.

notes

2005-01-17T06:54:00.000-08:00

'rules' of war?!

1984

fascism

thomas paine

Education

2005-01-15T14:05:00.000-08:00

There was an interview on Air America Radio this past week and they were talking about how we don't really educate our kids with any kind of *history*. They don't learn about Vietnam, Johnson, Nixon, Kent State... and have no historical reference for what's happening now.

I wondered what it would be like to visit a classroom teaching stuff that I *lived* through... remembering the Pentagon Papers and Watergate and the Berrigan brothers and how, even though we were in the so-called minority, we struggled and made some progress and eventually got Nixon to pull out of Vietnam AND got him out of office.

And then I thought about the energy I had then, compared with the energy I've got now. And I wondered where 'our' kids are, and why they aren't lit with those same fires.

Sigh.

Musings on Truth

2005-01-10T13:37:00.000-08:00

So the election sucked, big time. It's obvious that the Shrub's evil minions rigged the paperless computers to dump votes in his column and we are once again screwed. And the mainstream media doesn't seem to care. This all reminds me of "1984" and I am once again musing on the ease with which people, corporations, governments lie... without fear of retribution.

Didja ever have an automobile accident where the other car was in the wrong and the first thing the other driver says when they get out of their car is "It was your fault!" And they won't be swayed from that for anything?

The Shrub is still saying there are/were WMDs in Iraq and it's a lie and no one cares?

Shrub's campaign people lied like rugs about John Kerry's positions, his record, everything but the poor guy's hair color, and not a single major media outlet (with the exception of Air America Radio) bothered to set the story straight... moreover, they reported the lies as though they were facts.

I'm old enough to remember Woodward & Bernstein and Watergate...

Where's Ben Bradlee & the Washington Post? Where's the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers now that we really need them? What happened to investigative reporting?

Well, it looks to me like corporatization has taken them and us over, and even the big 'grassroots' organizations like "MoveOn" and "Common Cause" seem toothless... I mean, there should have been MASSIVE demonstrations after the election was stolen and there was nothing...

Our candidate, who promised he'd fight for us, folded, and so did the groups that could have... SHOULD have called for street protests on November 3rd. What are they thinking? ARE they thinking? How can this possibly get any better if no one will stand up for what's right?

Sigh...

I begin to think that it's all a big farce... that we do indeed live in "1984" where left is right and right is left and then they change back again and the history is simply rewritten to fit the new "facts." Just stay home and watch your TiVo and have another beer folks... You still have a job and a roof over your head... to hell with everyone else.

Entry the First

2004-10-25T13:09:00.000-07:00

Dunno exactly WHY I need a blog, but hey... it was free, and I'm all for free stuff on the internet. Besides, I can apparently send photos from my flickr website to my blog, which I couldn't do if I didn't have a blog to begin with.

These days I'm spending most of my energy worrying about the upcoming election and working for John Kerry. If Bush wins again, (actually, that's inaccurate, since he didn't win the first time, but instead stole the election with the help of his daddy's "supreme" court) I may start seriously about moving to Canada.